Planning appeal decision
Land East of Harrisons Lane , Ringmer , BN8 5RB
Planning appeal 3314192 at Land East of Harrisons Lane , Ringmer , BN8 5RB (Lewes District Council) was dismissed on 17 October 2023 by Inspector Nunn M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the landscape and the setting of the South Downs National Park (SDNP).
outline planning application (with all matters reserved except for access) for the demolition of an existing residential property and the erection of up to 200 residential dwellings including affordable housing with the provision of vehicular access on to Harrisons Lane and pedestrian and cycle access on to Potato Lane alongside public open spaces, biodiversity enhancement, sustainable urban drainage systems, landscaping, infrastructure, and earthworks.’ Appeal B: Ref APP/P1425/W/23/3315235 Land East of Harrisons Lane, Ringmer, East Sussex
- Authority
- Lewes District Council
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Unknown
- Inspector
- Nunn M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the landscape and the setting of the South Downs National Park (SDNP)
- whether the proposals are acceptable in terms of: highway safety, heritage assets, drainage and sewerage, educational capacity, locational accessibility and the 'village feel' of Ringmer
- the planning balance
What decided it
The great weight attached to the harm caused to the landscape setting of the South Downs National Park (and consequential harm to the Park itself) outweighed the housing and other benefits of both schemes.
The significant/serious harm to the setting of the SDNP (attracting great weight) and to Potato Lane's rural character was found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of housing delivery (including affordable housing), economic and social benefits, and environmental gains, both outside and, in the alternative, within the tilted balance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP10Policy DM1Policy DM25Policy DM33Policy 4.1Policy 6.3Policy 8.11Interim Policy
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 48Paragraph 57Paragraph 60Paragraph 76Paragraph 95Paragraph 111Paragraph 174Paragraph 176Paragraph 203
- Judgments
- Bernhard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]; R(Akester) v Secretary of State [2010] EWHC 232 (Admin); R(Wyatt) v Fareham Borough Council [2022] EWCA Civ 983
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Lewes District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed6 October 20266005671Land South of Green Road, Wivelsfield Green, RH17 7QL
- Allowed30 September 2026600986933 Sherwood Road, Seaford, BN25 3EH
- Allowed9 April 20263373143The Old Mill Bungalow Barcombe Mills, Barcombe, Lewes, BN8 5BS
- Dismissed31 March 2026600168662 Meeching Road, Newhaven, East Sussex, BN9 9RH
- Allowed8 December 2025337331449 Station Road, Newhaven, BN9 0NN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®