Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 March 20233314302

3 Ridgemont Close, Summertown, Oxford, Oxon, OX2 7PJ

Planning appeal 3314302 at 3 Ridgemont Close, Summertown, Oxford, Oxon, OX2 7PJ (Oxford City Council) was dismissed on 29 March 2023 by Inspector Langford-Tejrar K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area.

Demolition of the existing conservatory and porch to north-east elevation. Erection of a single storey extension to north-east elevation with formation of 2No. dormer windows and insertion of 1No. rooflight in association with loft conversion. Erection of a single storey extension to the south-west elevation, with replacement of balcony doors with window, insertion of 2No. additional windows at ground and first floor and insertion of 4No. rooflights. Insertion of flue to north-east roofslope. Formation of new vehicle access from Woodstock Road, with provision of dropped kerb, carparking, entrance gates and associated landscaping

Authority
Oxford City Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Langford-Tejrar K
Postcode
OX2 7PJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host dwelling and surrounding area
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with development plan policies on design quality and highway safety, with no material considerations outweighing these conflicts.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DH1Policy HOS2Policy M3Policy RE7

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

64 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Oxford City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed7 October 20266013373
    27 Norham Road, Oxford, OX2 6SQ
  2. Dismissed2 February 20266002005
    155 Godstow Road, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX2 8PG
  3. Dismissed26 January 20263374673
    19 Blandford Avenue, Oxford, OX2 8EA
  4. Dismissed19 December 20253372684
    58 Dashwood Road, Oxford, OX4 4SH
  5. Dismissed19 December 20253370960
    55 Randolph Street, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX4 1YA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.