Planning appeal decision
16 & A Half St. Pauls Place, LONDON, N1 2QF
the “erection of garden office
- Authority
- London Borough of Islington
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Cleary D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the significance of the Listed Building and its setting
- the character and appearance of the Canonbury Conservation Area
- protected trees
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Grade II Listed Building and its setting, combined with harm to the conservation area's character and appearance, could not be outweighed by the identified benefits of the proposal.
Framework references: 202, 199
Plan policies cited: D4, HC1, CS8, CS9, DM2.1, DM2.3, DM6.5
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®