Planning appeal decision
Wyndrush, 6 Headcorn Road, Platts Heath, Kent, ME17 2NH
Planning appeal 3314651 at Wyndrush, 6 Headcorn Road, Platts Heath, Kent, ME17 2NH (Maidstone Borough Council) was dismissed on 23 June 2023 by Inspector Douglas L, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development, with regard to local and national policies.
described on the application form as: ‘Proposed replacement of single bungalow with a development of seven houses
- Authority
- Maidstone Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Douglas L
- Postcode
- ME17 2NH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development, with regard to local and national policies
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring residential properties at 3 School Lane and 7 and 9 Lenham Road, with particular regard to outlook and privacy
- the effect of the proposed development on the Stodmarsh Special Area of Conservation (SAC), Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site
What decided it
The cumulative conflict with the development plan arising from the unsustainable location, harm to rural character, and unacceptable harm to neighbours' living conditions outweighed the modest benefits of the scheme.
The modest benefits of the proposal, together with any other benefits, did not outweigh the harm caused by conflict with the Council's strategic approach to housing location, character and appearance impacts, and harm to neighbours' living conditions.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SS1Policy DM1Policy SP17Policy DM30Policy D1Policy CP1Policy D2Policy AT1Policy AT2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 8
- Judgments
- Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL, 1982, P37]
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Maidstone Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed29 October 2026601053621 Tasker Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, ME15 8NZ
- Allowed27 October 20266015190Little Southernden, Southernden Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LL
- Allowed27 October 20266011721Loxley House, Gravelly Bottom Road, Kingswood, Maidstone, ME17 3NT
- Allowed27 October 20266011076Little Southernden, Southernden Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LL
- Allowed26 October 20266010539Land Rear Of 58 Church Street, Boughton Monchelsea, Maidstone, ME17 4HN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®