Planning appeal decision
Wyndrush, 6 Headcorn Road, Platts Heath, Kent, ME17 2NH
described on the application form as: ‘Proposed replacement of single bungalow with a development of seven houses
- Authority
- Maidstone Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Douglas L
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development, with regard to local and national policies
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring residential properties at 3 School Lane and 7 and 9 Lenham Road, with particular regard to outlook and privacy
- the effect of the proposed development on the Stodmarsh Special Area of Conservation (SAC), Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site
What decided it
The cumulative conflict with the development plan arising from the unsustainable location, harm to rural character, and unacceptable harm to neighbours' living conditions outweighed the modest benefits of the scheme.
The modest benefits of the proposal, together with any other benefits, did not outweigh the harm caused by conflict with the Council's strategic approach to housing location, character and appearance impacts, and harm to neighbours' living conditions.
Framework references: 8
Plan policies cited: Policy SS1, Policy DM1, Policy SP17, Policy DM30, Policy D1, Policy CP1, Policy D2, Policy AT1, Policy AT2
Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL, 1982, P37]
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®