Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 October 20233314980

Overdene Drive, Ifield, Crawley, RH11 0JP

telecommunications installation: proposed 15.0m Phase 9 slimline Monopole and associated ancillary works

Authority
Crawley Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Hobbs J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal proposal meets the requirements of Schedule 2, Part 16, Class A of the GPDO 2015
  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of residents of 390, 392 and 394 Ifield Drive, with regard to outlook and, if any harm would occur whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The appeal proposal failed to meet the procedural requirements of Schedule 2, Part 16, Class A of the GPDO 2015 due to lack of substantive evidence that the relevant civil safeguarding authority had been notified of the proposal.

Plan policies cited: Policy CH2, Policy CH3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.