Planning appeal decision
Roseacre Scragged Oak Road, Detling, Maidstone, ME14 3HL
Planning appeal 3315075 at Roseacre Scragged Oak Road, Detling, Maidstone, ME14 3HL (Maidstone Borough Council) was dismissed on 13 June 2023 by Inspector Bowyer J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposed dwelling would accord with development plan policies relevant to housing proposals outside of settlement boundaries including with particular regard to the requirement for a dwelling on the site, and the financial basis of the enterprise.
demolition of 7(no) outbuildings; erection of 1(no) detached dwelling, 3(no) replacement buildings to support existing rural enterprise, comprising of 1(no) polytunnel with associated hard and soft landscaping, erection of farm shop/cafe with attached machinery store, and erection of 1(no) timber building. Part retrospective for change of use of land for keeping of livestock, retention of existing timber storage and processing yard, retention and provision of plant nursery
- Authority
- Maidstone Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- agricultural · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Bowyer J
- Postcode
- ME14 3HL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposed dwelling would accord with development plan policies relevant to housing proposals outside of settlement boundaries including with particular regard to the requirement for a dwelling on the site, and the financial basis of the enterprise
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and the landscape and scenic beauty of the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
- the effect of the proposal on highway safety
- whether or not the proposed retail use would accord with development plan policies relevant to retail proposals outside of settlement boundaries including with regard to whether or not it would support the maintenance of land in agricultural and other appropriate land based uses
What decided it
The cumulative and significant harm to the character, appearance and landscape/scenic beauty of the Kent Downs AONB, combined with unjustified need for the dwelling and harm to highway safety, outweighed the benefits and personal circumstances relied on by the appellant.
The great weight attached to harm to the AONB, together with significant harm to character and appearance, harm to highway safety and an unjustified countryside dwelling, outweighed the limited economic and site-management benefits and the significant weight given to the appellant's personal circumstances, tipping the balance against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SS1Policy DM34Policy DM1Policy SP17Policy DM30Policy DM40
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 80
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Maidstone Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed29 October 2026601053621 Tasker Close, Bearsted, Maidstone, ME15 8NZ
- Allowed27 October 20266015190Little Southernden, Southernden Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LL
- Allowed27 October 20266011721Loxley House, Gravelly Bottom Road, Kingswood, Maidstone, ME17 3NT
- Allowed27 October 20266011076Little Southernden, Southernden Road, Headcorn, TN27 9LL
- Allowed26 October 20266010539Land Rear Of 58 Church Street, Boughton Monchelsea, Maidstone, ME17 4HN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®