Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 February 20243315102

41 Linden Grove, London, SE15 3LW

Planning appeal 3315102 at 41 Linden Grove, London, SE15 3LW (London Borough of Southwark) was dismissed on 20 February 2024 by Inspector Mahoney F, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the loss of a non-designated heritage asset (Victorian villa) would be outweighed by public benefits, particularly affordable housing provision.

for the demolition of detached house and erection of block of flats with nine units, landscaped front courtyard, two car parking spaces, communal amenity space, secure cycle and refuse storage, and garden pavilion

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Mahoney F
Postcode
SE15 3LW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the loss of a non-designated heritage asset (Victorian villa) would be outweighed by public benefits, particularly affordable housing provision
  • Whether the proposed development provides 35% affordable housing and intermediate homes or an equivalent financial contribution in accordance with Policy P1

What decided it

The inadequacies in the terms of the Unilateral Undertaking meant the late-stage review mechanism could not be properly secured, leaving the heritage harm from loss of the Victorian villa uncompensated by deliverable public benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Southwark Plan Policy P1Southwark Plan Policy SP1Southwark Plan Policy P70Southwark Plan Policy P21London Plan Policy HC1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 8Paragraph 189Paragraph 195Paragraph 199Paragraph 203

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

492 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Southwark

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed20 October 20266010489
    269-275 Rye Lane and 1A Philip Walk, London, SE15 4UA
  2. Dismissed30 September 20266001859
    5 More London Place, London, SE1 2BY
  3. Dismissed29 September 20266003226
    Flat 4, 99 Kennington Park Road, London, SE11 4JJ
  4. Dismissed16 September 20266012237
    123 Benhill Road, London, SE5 7LZ
  5. Dismissed17 August 20266007608
    134 Tappesfield Road, London, SE15 3EZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.