Planning appeal decision
Land to the Rear of Orchard Walls, Beech Avenue, Effingham, Surrey, KT24 5PG
Planning appeal 3315742 at Land to the Rear of Orchard Walls, Beech Avenue, Effingham, Surrey, KT24 5PG (Guildford Borough Council) was dismissed on 15 February 2024 by Inspector Pattison B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would provide suitable measures for sustainability.
development of 1no. single storey 2-bed dwelling house with access from The Crossroads
- Authority
- Guildford Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Pattison B
- Postcode
- KT24 5PG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would provide suitable measures for sustainability
- whether the proposal would make suitable provision towards affordable housing
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the effect that it would have on the wider allocated Orchard Walls development which is currently under construction
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local area with particular regard to the extent to which it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Effingham Conservation Area and the effect on a non-designated heritage asset
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the future occupiers of Plot 8 of the Orchard Walls development, with particular reference to outlook
What decided it
The failure to demonstrate appropriate provision of measures to address climate change, sustainable design, construction and energy use, combined with the inadequate legal agreement for affordable housing contribution, constituted significant harm that conflicted with the development plan as a whole.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy D2 of the Guildford Borough Local Plan: Strategy and Sites, 2015-2034 (2019)Policy D1 of the GLPSSPolicy D3 of the GLPSSPolicy D4 of the DMPPolicy D5 of the DMPPolicy D7 of the DMPPolicy D8 of the DMPPolicy D14 of the DMPPolicy D15 of the DMPPolicy D16 of the DMPPolicy D18 of the DMPPolicy D20 of the DMPPolicy H1 of the GLPSSPolicy H2 of the GLPSSPolicy ID1 of the GLPSSPolicy ENP-G2 of the ENPPolicy ENP1-H1 of the ENPPolicy ENP-H2 of the ENP
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 209
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Guildford Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed20 October 20266013901Anchor House, Station Row, Shalford, GU4 8BY
- Dismissed19 October 2026601400132 Fairborne Way, Guildford, gu29gb
- decided16 October 202660107129 Baldwin Crescent, Guildford, GU4 7XW
- Allowed15 October 20266009940Store Rear of 4 Station Parade, Ockham Road South, East Horsley, KT24 6QN
- Allowed15 October 20266008529Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®