Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice upheld5 February 20243315917

Land Known As Building South West of Walnut Cottage, Newark Road, Kilvington, Nottingham, NG13 9PD

Planning appeal 3315917 at Land Known As Building South West of Walnut Cottage, Newark Road, Kilvington, Nottingham, NG13 9PD (Newark & Sherwood District Council) was dismissed on 5 February 2024 by Inspector Hitchcock R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Appeal A ground (c): whether the matters stated in the enforcement notice constitute a breach of planning control.

Appeal A: erection of a building (enforcement); Appeal B: alterations to agricultural building for mushroom production; Appeal C: alteration and conversion of building for use as holiday accommodation

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Hitchcock R
Postcode
NG13 9PD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A ground (c): whether the matters stated in the enforcement notice constitute a breach of planning control
  • Appeal A ground (a): whether planning permission ought to be granted for the erection of a building, having regard to sustainable siting in accordance with the Council's adopted spatial strategy and the effect on character and appearance
  • Appeal A ground (f): whether the steps required by the notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach
  • Appeal A ground (g): whether the period specified in the notice falls short of what should reasonably be allowed
  • Appeal B: whether the building is sustainably sited in accordance with the Council's adopted spatial strategy including having regard to the effect on character and appearance
  • Appeal C: whether the site provides a suitable location for holiday accommodation and the effect on character and appearance

What decided it

Appeal A: the building does not comply with the approved plans and has been used for non-agricultural storage purposes, constituting an unlawful breach with no justification for its open countryside location. Appeal B: the proposal meets the locational justification test under Policy DM8 with a demonstrated need for mushroom production and minimal landscape impact. Appeal C: the absence of locational justification for holiday accommodation in a remote location and the resulting harm to rural character outweigh the economic benefits.

Appeal A: no balancing exercise; the proposal conflicts with the development plan and is refused. Appeal B: no balancing exercise required; the proposal accords with the development plan. Appeal C: the economic benefits of holiday accommodation are outweighed by the harm to rural character and the unsustainable location resulting in increased private vehicle use.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Policy 3Core Policy 7Core Policy 9Core Policy 13Policy DM5Policy DM8Spatial Policy 3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 84Paragraph 85Paragraph 56
Judgments
Sage v SSETR & Maidstone BC [2003]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

8 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Newark and Sherwood

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Quashed On Legal Grounds15 July 20263375307
    Lilac Farm Cottage, Water Lane, Oxton, Southwell, NG25 0SH
  2. Notice varied and upheld21 August 20253329019
    Hutchinson Engineering Services Limited, Great North Road, Newark on Trent, Nottinghamshire, NG23 6SY
  3. Notice varied and upheld18 June 20253346396
    Downside Workshop and Store, Great North Road, Bathley, Newark, NG23 6HP
  4. Notice varied and upheld12 June 20253332281
    The Grain Store, Far Barn Farm,, Meadow Agriculture Ltd, Priory Road, Thurgarton, NG14 7GT, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG14 7GT
  5. Planning permission granted29 May 20253332032
    B & Q Plc, Unit A, Maltings Retail Park North Gate, Newark, NG24 1GJ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.