Planning appeal decision
Roebuck Farm, Lemsford, AL8 7TW
Planning appeal 3316025 at Roebuck Farm, Lemsford, AL8 7TW (Welwyn Hatfield Council) was dismissed on 10 August 2023 by Inspector Miles H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
Outline application for the development of 33no. dwellings (Use Class C3) together with all ancillary works (all matters reserved except access).
- Authority
- Welwyn Hatfield Council
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Unknown
- Inspector
- Miles H
- Postcode
- AL8 7TW
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposed development on the setting of the nearby listed buildings including Grade II listed The Old Cottage, The Sun Inn, Lemsford Mill, Mill House and No.37, on the character and appearance of the Lemsford Conservation Area and the effect on the non-designated heritage asset of Roebuck Farm and Farmhouse.
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal.
What decided it
The substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt, combined with other identified harms, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of the scheme, so very special circumstances did not exist.
The substantial weight attributed to Green Belt harm (inappropriateness and openness), together with heritage and character harms, was not clearly outweighed by the significant weight given to housing, affordable housing and other benefits including biodiversity net gain, so the appeal was dismissed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SADM 34Policy SADM15Policy H7Policy SP7Policy D1Policy D2Policy RA10Policy SP9Policy SADM16Policy R11
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 202Paragraph 148Paragraph 11
- Judgments
- Wheatcroft
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Welwyn Hatfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed5 October 202660098922A Whitehill, Welwyn, AL6 9AF
- Dismissed9 September 20266010292Rose Cottage, Kentish Lane, Hatfield, AL9 6JP
- Dismissed28 May 2026600320349 The Ridgeway, Cuffley, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, EN6 4BD
- Dismissed27 May 20266003536East Lodge, Judge's Hill, Northaw, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, EN6 4NL
- Planning permission granted6 March 2026335467120 Ayot Green, Ayot St. Peter, Welwyn, AL6 9AB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®