®Planning appeal decision
Treetops, Latchmore Bank, Little Hallingbury, Bishop's Stortford, CM22 7PH
Planning appeal 3316209 at Treetops, Latchmore Bank, Little Hallingbury, Bishop's Stortford, CM22 7PH (Uttlesford District Council) was dismissed on 3 August 2023 by Inspector Pipkin R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
demolish existing single storey self-contained 1-bedroom annex and construct a new 2-bedroom annex
- Authority
- Uttlesford District Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Pipkin R
- Postcode
- CM22 7PH
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- whether or not the proposal would amount to a separate dwelling and if so, whether this would be inappropriate development in the countryside
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations and if so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would be materially larger than the building it replaces, cause harm to openness and character, and the benefits to the appellant would not amount to very special circumstances to justify the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S6Policy GEN2Policy H7
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 137Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision
More decisions in Uttlesford District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed22 October 20266011359Equestrian Site, Birchanger Road, Birchanger, Bishop's Stortford, CM23 5QH
- Allowed15 January 20263373483Land Adj to Greylands Barn , Chelmsford Road, White Roding, Dunmow, CM6 1RF
- Dismissed13 January 20263373643Land Adj to South View, Maple Lane, Wimbish, Essex, CB10 2XG
- Dismissed23 September 20253364102Land South of Birchanger Lane , Birchanger Lane , Birchanger , Bishops Stortford
- Dismissed15 August 20253366933Lock Farm House Dell Lane, Spellbrook, Bishop's Stortford, CM22 7SG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.