Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 August 20233316209

Treetops, Latchmore Bank, Little Hallingbury, BISHOP'S STORTFORD, CM22 7PH

demolish existing single storey self-contained 1-bedroom annex and construct a new 2-bedroom annex

Authority
Uttlesford District Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Pipkin R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether or not the proposal would amount to a separate dwelling and if so, whether this would be inappropriate development in the countryside
  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations and if so, would this amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would be materially larger than the building it replaces, cause harm to openness and character, and the benefits to the appellant would not amount to very special circumstances to justify the development.

Framework references: 137, 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy S6, Policy GEN2, Policy H7

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.