Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 May 20243316703

Land south of Ashford Road, Harrietsham, Maidstone, Kent, ME17 1WH

Residential development comprising 58 new dwellings (to include 24 affordable) with associated parking (including electric charging points), cycle storage, landscaping, refuse & recycling facilities, and children's play area

Authority
Maidstone Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Simpson L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site is suitable for the proposed development with regard to the Council's strategy for the location of residential development.
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.

What decided it

The significant, cumulative harm to the character and appearance of the area, principally from the discordant site layout and the bulk and scale of the proposed apartment building, outweighed the benefits of the scheme.

the significant benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing and biodiversity net gain did not outweigh the substantial harm to character and appearance and the full weight attributed to conflict with the LPR policies

Framework references: 135, 182

Plan policies cited: LPRSA101, LPRSS1, LPRSP9, LPRSP14, LPRSP15, LPRQD2, LPRQD4, LPRSP10(B)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.