Planning appeal decision
Woodmans, Hyde Lane, Churt, Surrey, GU10 2LP
Planning appeal 3316737 at Woodmans, Hyde Lane, Churt, Surrey, GU10 2LP (Waverley Borough Council) was dismissed on 19 July 2023 by Inspector Parsons J, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies.
Appeal A: an agro-forestry building to serve woodland; Appeal B: an agro-forestry building including ancillary workers dwelling to serve woodland
- Authority
- Waverley Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- agricultural · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
- Inspector
- Parsons J
- Postcode
- GU10 2LP
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies
- Openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, having regard to the Surrey Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) and Area of Great Landscape Value (AGLV)
- The effect of the proposal on Protected Species and biodiversity
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness (and, in Appeal B, additional AONB/AGLV harm) was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations advanced, so very special circumstances did not exist
in both appeals the substantial Green Belt harm, and in Appeal B the additional AONB/AGLV harm, outweighed the collective benefits of biodiversity enhancement, environmental benefit, housing supply boost and personal circumstances, so the balance tipped against the proposals
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy RE2Policy RE3Policy TD1Policy NE1Policy DM1Policy DM4Policy DM11Policy DM15Policy DM16
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 176
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Waverley Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed22 October 20266013698Markwick Farmhouse, Markwick Lane, Godalming, GU8 4BE
- Dismissed5 October 20266012552Dene End, Sands Lane, Tilford Nr Farnham, GU10 2BA
- Dismissed5 October 20266011947Land off Station Road, Hydestile, Godalming, GU8 4DB
- Dismissed5 October 20266009555Combe Farm, Alldens Lane, Godalming, GU8 4AP
- Dismissed22 July 20266008792Mossy Copse, Smithwood Common Rd, Cranleigh, GU6 8QR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®