Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 January 20243316788

108-114 & 118-120 Pampisford Road, Purely , London, CR2 2NF

Planning appeal 3316788 at 108-114 & 118-120 Pampisford Road, Purely , London, CR2 2NF (London Borough of Croydon) was dismissed on 8 January 2024 by Inspector McDonald K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

the demolition of 6no. detached houses & the erection of a residential development including access, parking, cycle and refuse storage and landscaping

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
McDonald K
Postcode
CR8 2NF

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 116 Pampisford Road and 1-15 Montpelier Road, with regard to privacy and outlook

What decided it

The failure of the planning obligation to secure the delivery of affordable housing and other necessary infrastructure across the whole site due to the absence of all landowners as parties to the deed rendered the proposal unacceptable despite its compliance with development plan policies and absence of harm to character, appearance and living conditions.

The benefits of housing delivery were outweighed by the failure to secure important and necessary infrastructure, such that the adverse impacts of granting permission would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SP4Policy DM10Policy DM10.6Policy D2Policy D3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

255 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Croydon

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266015751
    20 Newark Road, South Croydon, CR2 6HQ
  2. Dismissed26 October 20266014574
    58 Kingswood Way, South Croydon, CR2 8QQ
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266013110
    7 Quadrant Road, Thornton Heath, Croydon, CR7 7DB
  4. Dismissed22 October 20266014301
    77-81, North End, Croydon, CR0 1TJ
  5. Dismissed22 October 20266009641
    3 The Spinney, Off Warren Road, Purley, CR8 1AB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.