Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 January 20243316800

Land Adjacent to 16 Lloyds Green, Wittersham, Tenterden, TN30 7NX

Planning appeal 3316800 at Land Adjacent to 16 Lloyds Green, Wittersham, Tenterden, TN30 7NX (Ashford Borough Council) was dismissed on 11 January 2024 by Inspector Smith J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect on living conditions for occupiers of 17 Lloyds Green and future occupiers of the proposed development, with particular regard to privacy.

to create 2 new houses

Authority
Ashford Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Smith J
Postcode
TN30 7NX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect on living conditions for occupiers of 17 Lloyds Green and future occupiers of the proposed development, with particular regard to privacy
  • the effect on the character and appearance of the area, taking account of its location within the High Weald National Landscape and the effect on existing trees
  • whether the proposal would protect or enhance biodiversity

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to privacy for existing and future occupiers, combined with the incongruous design impact and inadequate biodiversity assessment, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest housing supply benefit.

the harm to living conditions, character and appearance, and unresolved biodiversity concerns significantly outweighed the modest contribution to housing supply

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy HOU5Policy HOU15Policy SP1Policy SP6Policy ENV1Policy ENV5Policy ENV3b
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 135

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

9 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Ashford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266007592
    Homestall Farm, Ashford Road, High Halden, TN26 3BS
  2. Dismissed26 October 20266009946
    Daniel Farm, Smarden Bell Road, Pluckley, TN27 0SY
  3. Dismissed8 October 20266012673
    Land 150metres East by Southeast of Barkleys Farm, Burnthouse Lane, Smarden, TN27 8QQ
  4. Dismissed30 September 20266011717
    4-6 Ashford Road, Tenterden, TN30 6QU
  5. Dismissed30 September 20266011714
    4-6 Ashford Road, Tenterden, TN30 6QU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.