Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 September 20233316891

Honeycombe Field, Church Farm, Little Rissington, GL54 2NE

a new house of exceptional quality (NPPF paragraph 80e) to be built together with Passivhaus Premium Standard with associated landscape and biodiversity enhancement measures

Authority
Cotswold District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Griffiths P

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether any accordance with paragraph 80 e) of the National Planning Policy Framework would be a matter of such weight, as a material consideration, to justify setting aside the approach of the development plan to new housing outside principal and non-principal settlements, and to the protection of the Cotswolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
  • Whether the proposals meet the requirements of paragraph 80 e) of the Framework

What decided it

The proposed design failed to meet the high bar of 'exceptional quality' required by NPPF paragraph 80 e), so it could not justify departing from the development plan's restriction on isolated homes in the countryside and the AONB.

No material consideration (including paragraph 80 e) of the Framework) was of sufficient weight to justify setting aside the provisions of the development plan, which the proposal conflicted with.

Framework references: 80

Plan policies cited: Policy DS4, Policy EN5, Policy EN4

Judgments cited: Braintree; Bramshill

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.