Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed28 September 20233317196

Land Adjacent Hilltop, 353 Tanworth Lane, Shirley, Solihull, West Midlands, B90 4DU

demolition of outbuilding, erection of 2no. new build dwellings including associated access/highways alterations and landscaping

Authority
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rawle S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any other relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, or other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would cause substantial harm to openness, and this harm is not clearly outweighed by other considerations including the housing land supply shortfall, such that very special circumstances do not exist to justify the development.

The substantial harm to the Green Belt through inappropriateness and loss of openness was not clearly outweighed by the moderate social and economic benefits of two new dwellings and the housing land supply shortfall, therefore the balance did not favour the proposal.

Framework references: 11, 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy P17

Judgments cited: Julian Wood v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.