Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 December 20233317504

19 Christchurch Avenue, London, NW6 7QP

Planning appeal 3317504 at 19 Christchurch Avenue, London, NW6 7QP (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 4 December 2023 by Inspector Clark L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of existing and future occupiers, in terms of overlooking and loss of privacy.

for the conversion of existing outbuilding at the rear of 19 Christchurch Avenue into a self contained 3 bedroom C3 residential dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Clark L
Postcode
NW6 7QP

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of existing and future occupiers, in terms of overlooking and loss of privacy
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of future occupiers, in respect of access and the overall standard of accommodation
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the site and surrounding area, with particular regards to trees

What decided it

The proposed development would cause harmful overlooking and loss of privacy to existing and future occupiers, combined with inadequate access provision and insufficient evidence to protect trees, which together conflict with the development plan and material considerations do not indicate the decision should be made otherwise.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DMP1Policy BH1Policy BH4Policy BGI2Principle 5.1 of the Brent Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document SPD1 (2018)London Plan Policy D6

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 828 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266011176
    7 Chalfont Avenue, Wembley, HA9 6NW
  2. Allowed22 October 20266011738
    102 West Hill, Wembley, HA9 9RR
  3. Allowed9 October 20266010212
    276 Willesden Lane, London, NW2 5RB
  4. Dismissed6 October 20266013509
    115 Brondesbury Road, London, NW6 6RY
  5. Allowed1 October 20266011602
    28A Ridley Road, London, NW10 5UA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.