Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 January 20243317709

Lythe Lane, Steep, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU32 1AT

the erection of a building for the storage of materials

Authority
South Downs
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
Inspector
Rogers J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site would be suitable for the development, having regard to local planning policies on the location of development, the need to travel and the promotion of sustainable modes of transport
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the South Downs National Park

What decided it

The proposed development conflicts with local planning policies protecting the South Downs National Park from inappropriate development in the countryside and would cause unacceptable harm to landscape character and appearance that cannot be outweighed by any material considerations.

Framework references: 15

Plan policies cited: Policy SD25, Policy SD19, Policy SD1, Policy SD2, Policy SD4, Policy SD5, Policy SD7, Policy SD34

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.