Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 January 20243317709

Lythe Lane, Steep, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU32 1AT

Planning appeal 3317709 at Lythe Lane, Steep, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU32 1AT (South Downs) was dismissed on 3 January 2024 by Inspector Rogers J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site would be suitable for the development, having regard to local planning policies on the location of development, the need to travel and the promotion of sustainable modes of transport.

the erection of a building for the storage of materials

Authority
South Downs
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Minor general industry/storage/warehousing
Inspector
Rogers J
Postcode
GU32 1AT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the appeal site would be suitable for the development, having regard to local planning policies on the location of development, the need to travel and the promotion of sustainable modes of transport
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the South Downs National Park

What decided it

The proposed development conflicts with local planning policies protecting the South Downs National Park from inappropriate development in the countryside and would cause unacceptable harm to landscape character and appearance that cannot be outweighed by any material considerations.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SD25Policy SD19Policy SD1Policy SD2Policy SD4Policy SD5Policy SD7Policy SD34
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 15

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

36 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Downs

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed14 July 20266001892
    Empshott Grange, Church Lane, Empshott, Hampshire, GU33 6HT
  2. Dismissed23 June 20266001025
    Roman Mile Farm, Bignor Park Road, Bignor, West Sussex, RH20 1HQ
  3. Dismissed28 May 20266004671
    Reeves Britannia, 140 The Causeway, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU31 4LL
  4. Dismissed27 May 20266006395
    Weyridge, The Street, Binsted, Hampshire, GU34 4PF
  5. Dismissed11 May 20266000744
    17 High Street, Lewes, East Sussex, BN7 2LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.