Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld20 November 20243317807

The Old Orchard, Dennings Paddock Wallingford Road, KINGSBRIDGE, TQ7 1NF

Authority
South Hams District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Curnow R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Notice was correctly served (Ground (e))
  • Whether the matters alleged in the Notice have occurred (Ground (b))
  • Whether the matters alleged constitute a breach of planning control (Ground (c))
  • Whether the requirements of the Notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach (Ground (f))

What decided it

The Appellants were unable to show, other than for Shed D, that the sheds, yurts and decking had not been used for residential purposes or that this use was authorised by permitted development rights or the extant planning permission.

Judgments cited: Hibbitt v SSCLG [2016] EWHC 2853 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.