Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 November 20233317874

Land South of Stortford Road, Little Canfield, CM6 1SR

Erection of up-to 90 dwellings, including affordable housing, together with access from B1256 Stortford Road, sustainable drainage scheme with an outfall to the River Roding, Green Infrastructure including play areas and ancillary infrastructure

Authority
Uttlesford District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Dowsett J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the countryside in the vicinity of the appeal site
  • The effect of the proposal on the setting of nearby listed buildings

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the settings of multiple listed buildings, for which no clear and convincing justification was established, was not outweighed by the public benefits of the scheme.

The public benefits, including substantial weight for housing and affordable housing delivery and moderate weight for other benefits, did not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the settings of the listed buildings and the harm to the character and appearance of the countryside.

Framework references: 11, 174, 197, 199, 200, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy S7, Policy S8, Policy GEN2, Policy ENV2

Judgments cited: R (on the application of James Hall and Co. Ltd.) v Bradford Metropolitan District Council v Co-Operative Group Limited, Dalehead Properties Limited [2019] EWHC 2899 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.