Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 December 20233317875

2A Guildford Road, ILFORD, IG3 9YB

a residential build to replace vacant office

Authority
London Borough of Redbridge
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
McDonald K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of the upper floors of 366 and 368 Green Lane with specific regard to outlook
  • The effect of the proposal on the Epping Forest Special Area of Conservation

What decided it

The unacceptable adverse impact upon the living conditions of the occupiers of 366 and 368 Green Lane, combined with the unmitigated likely significant effect on Epping Forest SAC, outweighed the housing delivery benefits.

The tilted balance under paragraph 11(d) of the NPPF was engaged due to the Council's failure to demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply, but the protection of Epping Forest SAC as an area of particular importance provided a clear reason for refusal; additionally, the adverse impact on neighbouring living conditions would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the proposal.

Framework references: 130, 11

Plan policies cited: Policy D3 of the London Plan (March 2021), Policy LP26 of the Redbridge Local Plan (March 2018), Policy LP39 of the Redbridge Local Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.