Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed19 December 20233317932

Land off the Coppice, Poynton, SK12 1SR

erection of a single detached dwelling (dormer bungalow)

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Dring G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The application of the Wood case principle that village boundaries defined in local plans are not determinative, and assessment of the site 'on the ground' demonstrates it is spatially and visually located within the village of Higher Poynton and constitutes limited infilling, therefore not inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

Framework references: 147, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy PG3, Policy PG10, Policy PG6, Policy MP1, Policy SD1, Policy SD2, Policy HOU3

Judgments cited: Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.