Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 December 20233317974

Regency Court 89-111 High Road, LONDON, E18 2JT

an upward extension of an additional single storey on an existing 4-storey detached block of flats consisting of 4 x 1 bed flats

Authority
London Borough of Redbridge
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
McDonald K

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the floor to ceiling height of any additional storey, measured internally, would exceed the lower of (i) 3 metres; or (ii) the floor to ceiling height, measured internally, of any storey of the principal part of the existing building
  • Whether the external appearance of the building would be acceptable

What decided it

The absence of drawings detailing the floor to ceiling height of the proposed additional storey meant the Inspector could not establish whether the development complied with the GPDO limitations, resulting in dismissal of the appeal.

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.