Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed13 March 20243318256

272 Chase Side , Enfield , N14 4PR

Planning appeal 3318256 at 272 Chase Side , Enfield , N14 4PR (London Borough of Enfield) was allowed on 13 March 2024 by Inspector Livingstone C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the principle of the proposal.

double storey side and rear extensions. New roof over main building. External alterations and conversion of existing dwelling into self-contained flats with associated car parking, cycle parking refuse facilities and amenity space

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Livingstone C
Postcode
N14 4PR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the principle of the proposal
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of 274 Chase Side
  • whether future occupants of the proposal would be likely to experience acceptable living conditions
  • whether the proposal is accessible, including appropriate car and cycle parking provision and the effect of the proposal on highway safety and the free flow of traffic on Chase Side

What decided it

The proposal provides a mix of housing types including priority three-bedroom family homes without creating an over-concentration of conversions, and would not materially harm character, appearance, neighbour amenity or highway safety when assessed against development plan policies and the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D3Policy D6Policy T5Policy T6Policy CP5Policy CP25Policy CP30Policy DMD5Policy DMD8Policy DMD37Policy DMD45Policy DMD46Policy DMD47
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 56

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

453 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  2. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  3. Allowed28 August 20266008361
    9 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
  4. Dismissed6 August 20266006826
    28 The Crest, London, N13 5JT
  5. Dismissed20 July 20266010350
    19 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.