Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld20 November 20243318268

26 Coniston Gardens, LONDON, N9 8NB

without planning permission, the unauthorised material change of use of the single-family dwelling into 2 self- contained units of accommodation involving the ground floor side extension as a 1x1 bedroom flat highlighted in blue for identification purposes only

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Satheesan R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the unauthorised use on the living conditions for the occupiers of the appeal building with particular regard to privacy, outlook, daylight, sunlight and the provision of floorspace and amenity space

What decided it

The unacceptable living conditions created for occupiers of the ground floor 1-bedroom flat, particularly poor daylight, sunlight, outlook, privacy and substandard internal floorspace, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited benefit of one additional dwelling.

The adverse impacts of the unauthorised use in terms of harm to living conditions for occupiers of the one-bedroom ground floor dwelling significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited benefits associated with one additional one-bedroom flat, even applying the presumption in favour of sustainable development under paragraph 11d of the Framework.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy D6 of the London Plan 2021, Policy CP4 of the Enfield Core Strategy 2010, Policy DMD8 of the Enfield Development Management Document 2014, Policy DMD9 of the Enfield Development Management Document 2014

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.