Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 October 20233318288

Newnham, 10 Bickenhill Lane, Marston Green, Solihull, West Midlands, B37 7EY

outline of one two storey infill house adjacent to Newnham, 10 Bickenhill Lane

Authority
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Rawle S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any other relevant development plan policies
  • the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt causing substantial harm to openness, which is not clearly outweighed by other considerations including the housing land supply shortfall.

The substantial weight given to inappropriateness and considerable harm to openness significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest social and economic benefits and sustainability considerations, even in the context of a 3.6 year housing land supply.

Framework references: 11, 147, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy P17

Judgments cited: Julian Wood v The Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWCA Civ 195

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.