Planning appeal decision
124 Aldermans Hill, London, N13 4PT
Planning appeal 3318468 at 124 Aldermans Hill, London, N13 4PT (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 12 September 2023 by Inspector Jones D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the time given to comply with the enforcement notice requirements is too short.
the unauthorised erection of a security cabin (outlined in blue on the plan for identification purposes only), to the front of the premises
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Jones D
- Postcode
- N13 4PT
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the time given to comply with the enforcement notice requirements is too short
What decided it
The absence of planning permission for an alternative scheme and the need for a fixed, reasonable compliance period meant the appellant's request for an extension to allow further planning applications could not be justified.
The decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Enfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Notice varied and upheld4 June 20263336794Land on West Side of Burnt Farm Ride, Enfield, EN2 9DY
- Notice varied and upheld19 May 20263357359Land on the South Side of Southbury Road, Enfield, EN1 1NH
- Dismissed17 March 20266002727292-296 Firs Lane, London, N13 5QQ
- Notice varied and upheld16 March 2026335247678 Holmwood Road, Enfield, EN3 6QH
- Planning permission granted12 March 202633512504 Broomfield Avenue, London, N13 4JN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®