Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 January 20243318975

Maplescombe Farm, Maplescombe Lane, Farningham Lane, Kent, DA4 0JY

conversion of 6 agricultural buildings into 10 dwellings and the demolition of 3 additional agricultural buildings, in conjunction with associated parking, amenity area and landscaping

Authority
Sevenoaks District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Harbottle M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed conversion constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to its effect on the openness and purposes of including land in the GB
  • Its effect on the character and appearance of the area, including the landscape and scenic beauty of the Eynsford and Horton Kirby Downs Landscape within the Kent Downs National Landscape
  • Its effect on the significance of Maplescombe Farm House, a designated heritage asset
  • Its effects on ecology and biodiversity
  • The provision of affordable housing

What decided it

The harm to the distinctive character and dark-skies tranquillity of the Kent Downs National Landscape provided a clear reason for refusal that outweighed the benefits of housing delivery.

The adverse impacts of granting planning permission on the character of the National Landscape would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits of the 10 additional dwellings, even with significant weight afforded to housing delivery, when assessed against the development plan and the Framework as a whole.

Framework references: 155, 182, 143, 11

Plan policies cited: SP1, LO8, EN1, EN5, EN4, SP11, SP3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.