Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 May 20263319089

Ersan & Co Solicitors Ltd, 16 The Broadway, LONDON, N14 6PH

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Tinsley F

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the advertisement on the amenity of the area

What decided it

The internal illumination of the signage renders it unduly dominant and visually intrusive, resulting in unacceptable harm to the amenity of the conservation area.

Framework references: 141

Plan policies cited: Policy DMD41, Policy D4, Policy D8, Policy 7.4, Policy 7.6, Policy HC1, Policy CP30, Policy CP31, Policy DMD37, Policy DMD44

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.