Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed24 November 20233319541

5 Palmerston Crescent, London, N13 4UE

conversion of the existing house into 3 residential units (1x 1 bedroom, 1x 2 bedroom and 1x 3 bedroom)

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Major R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would result in the excessive clustering of residential conversions, having regard to the residential character of the area
  • whether the proposal would provide appropriate internal living conditions for future occupiers of the proposed lower floor flat with regard to outlook, ventilation, daylight and sunlight in the kitchen, and of the top floor flat with regard to floorspace
  • whether the proposal would provide appropriate levels of outdoor amenity space for the upper floor flats
  • whether the proposal would effect the provision for family accommodation
  • whether the proposal would make adequate provision for car and cycle parking

What decided it

The Council's failure to meet the Housing Delivery Test triggered the tilted balance under paragraph 11(d) of the Framework, which meant the limited harms from policy conflicts were outweighed by the benefits of housing delivery in a sustainable location.

The limited harms arising from conflicts with Policy DMD5 (clustering), Policy D6 (outdoor amenity space), and Policy T5 (cycle parking quality) were outweighed by the social, economic and environmental benefits of delivering two additional dwellings in a sustainable location with good public transport access, applying the tilted balance under paragraph 11 of the Framework.

Framework references: 11, 56, 60, 130, 134

Plan policies cited: Policy DMD5, Policy DMD8, Policy DMD9, Policy DMD37, Policy DMD45, Policy DMD47, Policy CP4, Policy CP5, Policy CP30, Policy D6, Policy T5, Policy T6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.