Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 February 20243319952

Church Hall, Grove Road, Enfield, Southgate, London, N11 1LX

Planning appeal 3319952 at Church Hall, Grove Road, Enfield, Southgate, London, N11 1LX (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 26 February 2024 by Inspector Cross D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would make suitable provision in respect of affordable housing.

redevelopment of site involving demolition of vacant church hall and construction of a part 5 and part 6 storey residential building to provide 4 maisonettes and 20 apartments with associated external works

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Cross D
Postcode
N11 1LX

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would make suitable provision in respect of affordable housing

What decided it

The failure to robustly justify that affordable housing could not be provided on-site, combined with the lack of transparency and certainty in the fallback mechanism, meant the proposal conflicted with local and national planning policy on affordable housing delivery, and this conflict significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of the scheme.

The benefits of housing supply, design quality and site remediation carried no more than limited weight, whereas the conflict with local and national policy on on-site affordable housing delivery carried significant weight as an adverse impact, resulting in the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighing the benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy H4 of the London Plan 2021Core Policy 3 (CP3) of the Council's Core Strategy 2010
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

487 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012855
    77 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  3. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010207
    61 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266012598
    21 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.