Planning appeal decision
Land R/O 296 Hoe Lane, Enfield, EN1 4JL
Planning appeal 3320237 at Land R/O 296 Hoe Lane, Enfield, EN1 4JL (London Borough of Enfield) was allowed on 9 October 2023 by Inspector Hughes L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular regard to privacy.
a new two storey dwelling
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Hughes L
- Postcode
- EN1 4JL
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular regard to privacy
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed development on highway safety, with particular regard to pedestrian movements
- the effect of the proposed development on waste management
What decided it
The Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply, which engaged the tilted balance under NPPF paragraph 11d, and the conclusion that the benefits of additional housing would not be significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the minor harm to neighbouring privacy.
The benefits of additional housing delivery in an established urban area, given the shortfall in five-year housing land supply, outweighed the minor harm to the privacy of occupiers of No. 298 Hoe Lane.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Enfield Development Management Document (DMD) (2014) Policy DMD7Enfield Development Management Document (DMD) (2014) Policy DMD8Enfield Development Management Document (DMD) (2014) Policy DMD37Enfield Development Management Document (DMD) (2014) Policy DMD6Enfield Development Management Document (DMD) (2014) Policy DMD45Enfield Development Management Document (DMD) (2014) Policy DMD47Enfield Development Management Document (DMD) (2014) Policy DMD48Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010-2025 (CS) (2010) Policy CP30Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010-2025 (CS) (2010) Policy CP24Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010-2025 (CS) (2010) Policy CP25Enfield Plan Core Strategy 2010-2025 (CS) (2010) Policy CP45London Plan (2021) Policy D4London Plan (2021) Policy D6London Plan (2021) Policy T6
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 11dParagraph 56Paragraph 112Paragraph 130
- Judgments
- Holborn Studios Ltd v The Council of the London Borough of Hackney [2017] EWHC 2823 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Enfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed21 October 202660105412 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
- Allowed20 October 2026600977328 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
- Allowed28 August 202660083619 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
- Dismissed20 July 2026601035019 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU
- Dismissed3 June 202660048031 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®