Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed1 December 20233320336

MULBERRY PLACE TOWN HALL, 5 CLOVE CRESCENT, LIGHTERMAN HOUSE, 3 CLOVE CRESCENT, London, E14 2BG

Authority
London Borough of Tower Hamlets
Appeal type
other · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Unknown
Inspector
Parker C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on heritage assets and on the location more generally
  • The overall planning balance

What decided it

The Inspector's finding that the proposal would cause no harm to heritage assets or townscape and would deliver very substantial benefits including affordable housing, PBSA, Build to Rent and a data centre, meaning it accorded with the development plan as a whole.

the very substantial benefits of affordable housing, data centre provision, Build to Rent and PBSA, together with other moderate to substantial benefits, weighed decisively in favour of the proposal, with no harm found to weigh against it

Framework references: 57, 60, 126, 130

Plan policies cited: Policy S.DH1, Policy S.DH3, Policy D.DH6, Policy D.H2, Policy S.H1, Policy D1, Policy D4, Policy D9, Policy HC1, Policy GG2, Policy H10, Policy G5, Policy D.ES3, Policy D11, Policy D.DH2, Policy D12

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.