Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 October 20233320394

Wisteria Cottage, Cheapside Road, ASCOT, SL5 7QH

the erection of a single storey side extension with covered porch, single storey rear infill extension, replace flat roof with pitched roof to single storey rear element, replacement roof and raising of the ridge, 2no. front dormers, alterations to fenestration and 2no. parking spaces following the demolition of the greenhouse and garage

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Murray D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the site lies in the Green Belt
  • If so, whether 'inappropriate development' and the effect on openness
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the host building as a non-designated heritage asset
  • If inappropriate development whether there are other considerations which clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt and result in very special circumstances

What decided it

The proposal would materially harm the architectural and historic character of the cottage as a non-designated heritage asset, and this harm was not outweighed by other considerations including the building's poor condition or claimed fallback position.

Framework references: 149, 203

Plan policies cited: Policy QP5, Policy QP3, Policy HE1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.