Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 January 20243320599

Land South of Shenley Hill, Radlett, WD7 7BD

the erection of up to 195 new homes (45% affordable), safeguarded land for the expansion of Newberries Primary School and provision of a new medical centre, along with associated access. Outline application to include the matter of Access (with the following matters reserved: Appearance, Landscaping, Layout and Scale)

Authority
Hertsmere Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Fagan N

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, specifically on the landscape
  • Whether any harm to the Green Belt, any harm to the landscape and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances (VSCs) necessary to justify the proposed development

What decided it

The cumulative benefits of the scheme did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt (by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness) and the substantial adverse landscape effects, so very special circumstances were not established.

The substantial weight given to housing supply, very substantial weight to affordable housing, and lesser weight to other benefits did not clearly outweigh the substantial Green Belt harm and substantial adverse landscape harm, so the balance tipped against allowing the appeal.

Framework references: 11, 12, 60, 85, 115, 142, 143, 145, 152, 153, 154, 155, 180

Plan policies cited: Policy SP1, Policy SP2, Policy CS2, Policy CS13, Policy CS16, Policy SADM26(iv), Policy HD3 (RNDP), Policy RV2 (RNDP)

Judgments cited: R oao Luton Borough Council v Central Bedfordshire Council & Houghton Regis Development Consortium and Others [2015] EWCA Civ 537; Compton Parish Council and Others v Guildford Borough Council and Others [2019] 3242 (Admin)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.