Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 December 20233320751

293 Lichfield Road, Willenhall, WV12 5BQ

Planning appeal 3320751 at 293 Lichfield Road, Willenhall, WV12 5BQ (Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council) was dismissed on 12 December 2023 by Inspector Plenty B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would affect the integrity of the Cannock Chase Special Area of Conservation (SAC).

the erection of a three-bedroom detached house and detached garage

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Plenty B
Postcode
WV12 5BQ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would affect the integrity of the Cannock Chase Special Area of Conservation (SAC)
  • The effect of the proposed dwelling on the character and appearance of the area, including on trees
  • The effect of the proposal on the future living conditions of occupiers and general public safety due to the stability of the site from the effects of coal mining
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of existing adjacent and future occupiers of the site, with respect to air quality

What decided it

The proposal would have a significant adverse effect on the integrity of the Cannock Chase SAC in the absence of suitable mitigation measures secured through a legal mechanism, which conflict with development plan policies outweighed the housing benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CPS3Policy EQ2Policy CSP3Policy CSP4Policy ENV1Policy ENV23Policy EN1Policy GP2Policy ENV18Policy ENV32Policy ENV3Policy HC2Policy ENV14Policy ENV8

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

32 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Walsall

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed15 October 20266008716
    Rooftop Food Court, Multi-Storey Car Park, George St, Walsall, Ws1 1RS
  2. Dismissed9 October 20266012207
    Land at Barr Lakes Lane, Walsall, WS5 3RB
  3. Allowed8 October 20266012149
    225, Lichfield Road, Rushall, WS4 1EA
  4. Dismissed30 September 20266013877
    57, Lincoln Road, Walsall, WS1 2DW
  5. Dismissed29 September 20266008378
    407 Chester Road, Walsall, WS9 0PH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.