Planning appeal decision
Putnam Construction Services Ltd, Oving Road, Quainton, Buckinghamshire, HP22 4RJ
Planning appeal 3320988 at Putnam Construction Services Ltd, Oving Road, Quainton, Buckinghamshire, HP22 4RJ (Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area *) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 9 December 2024 by Inspector Shields T, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the site is in a sustainable location.
without planning permission, the material change of use of land from agriculture to a mixed use of storage, parking, residential, and depot use with associated operational development consisting of the creation of hard standing and earth bunds, and the construction of buildings
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- employment-industrial · Change of use
- Inspector
- Shields T
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the site is in a sustainable location
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
What decided it
The significant harm to the character and appearance of the countryside from the unsustainable, urbanising development significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits and other considerations advanced in support of the appeal.
the totality of harm from the unsustainable location and significant harm to landscape character significantly and demonstrably outweighed the limited employment, housing and human-rights-related benefits, so the appeal was dismissed
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S1Policy S2Policy S3Policy C1Policy D6Policy NE4Policy BE2Policy WAD1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 85Paragraph 89
- Judgments
- Nelsovil v SSE [1962] 13 P&CR 151; Thrasyvoulou v SSE & Hackney LBC (No1) [1984] JPL 732; Gabbitas v SSE & Newham LBC [1985] JPL 630; Ravensdale Ltd v SSCLG & Waltham Forest LBC [2016] EWHC 2374 (Admin); Oates v SSCLG [2018] EWCA Civ 2229; Gravesham BC v SSE & O'Brien [1982] 47 P&CR 142; [1983] JPL 307; Burdle & Williams v SSE & New Forest RDC [1972] 1 WLR 1207; Murfitt v SSE & East Cambridgeshire DC [1980] JPL 598; Caldwell & Timberstore Ltd v SSLUHC & Buckinghamshire Council [2024] EWCA Civ 467; Oates v SSCLG & Canterbury CC [2017] EWHC 2716 (Admin), [2018] EWCA Civ 2229; [2019] JPL 251
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - Aylesbury Area
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Notice upheld30 September 20263370104New Bengal Blue, 17-19 Walton Road, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, HP21 7SR
- Notice upheld18 September 20263354830Una's Newsagency, 5 Buckingham Street, Aylesbury, HP20 2LA
- Planning permission granted8 April 20263349243The Green Man, 32 Market Square, Aylesbury, HP20 1TW
- Planning permission granted8 April 20263349240The Green Man, 32 Market Square, Aylesbury, HP20 1TW
- Unknown8 April 20263349212The Green Man, 32 Market Square, Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, HP20 1TW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®