Planning appeal decision
Land at Tewin Hill, Upper Green Road, Tewin, Hertfordshire, AL6 0LJ
Planning appeal 3321219 at Land at Tewin Hill, Upper Green Road, Tewin, Hertfordshire, AL6 0LJ (East Hertfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 13 October 2023 by Inspector Clarke B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development would be inappropriate in the Green Belt.
the erection of 18 residential dwellings, together with access, car parking, public open space and landscaping
- Authority
- East Hertfordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Clarke B
- Postcode
- AL6 0LJ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposed development would be inappropriate in the Green Belt
- the effects of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- the effects of the development upon the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties
- the suitability of the appeal site as a location for the proposed development, with particular reference to the requirements of the development plan
- whether sufficient infrastructure would be provided
- if the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development
What decided it
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, combined with harm to openness, character and appearance, unsuitable location, and lack of secured infrastructure, was not clearly outweighed by the benefits of housing delivery and other considerations, so very special circumstances did not exist.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt, harm to openness, character and appearance, living conditions of neighbours, unsuitable location, and lack of completed legal agreement for infrastructure were not clearly outweighed by the moderate to limited benefits of housing supply, affordable housing, biodiversity improvements, and economic benefits, so very special circumstances did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GBR1Policy DES2Policy DES3Policy DES4Policy DPS2Policy TRA1Policy DEL2Policy CFLR1Policy CFLR7Policy CFLR9Policy CFLR10Policy TRA2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 148Paragraph 149
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Hertfordshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed28 October 20266008487The Ranch House, Amwell Hill, Great Amwell, Ware, SG12 9QZ
- Allowed14 October 2026601275023 Bishops Road, Tewin Wood, Tewin, AL6 0NP
- Dismissed28 September 20266006224Land Near Fanshawes Ware Park, Ware, SG12 0DX
- Dismissed25 September 20266006716Little Orchard, London Road, Spellbrook, Hertfordshire, CM23 4BA
- Allowed8 September 2026601070820 Bury Lane, Bramfield, SG14 2QL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®