Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 January 20243321505

Land to Rear of 296 Hoe Lane, Enfield, Middlesex, EN1 4JL

Planning appeal 3321505 at Land to Rear of 296 Hoe Lane, Enfield, Middlesex, EN1 4JL (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 3 January 2024 by Inspector Clark L, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed dwelling upon the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

demolition of existing dilapidated garage, concrete hardstanding and fencing and construction of a new build single storey dwelling house

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Clark L
Postcode
EN1 4JL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed dwelling upon the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • The effect of the proposed access arrangement on the living conditions of future intended occupiers
  • Whether the development would provide convenient and accessible facilities for waste management

What decided it

The cumulative harm to character and appearance, living conditions of future occupiers, and waste management accessibility outweighed the limited benefit of providing one additional dwelling.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D4 London PlanPolicy D6 London PlanPolicy T6.1 London Plan 2021Policy H2 London PlanPolicy CP30 Enfield Core Strategy 2010Policy CP24 Enfield Core Strategy 2010Policy CP25 Enfield Core Strategy 2010Policy DMD7 Enfield Development Management Document 2014Policy DMD8 Enfield Development Management Document 2014Policy DMD37 Enfield Development Management Document 2014Policy DMD45 Enfield Development Management Document 2014Policy DMD47 Enfield Development Management Document 2014Policy DMD48 Enfield Development Management Document 2014Enfield Waste and Recycling Storage Planning Guidance 2020

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

231 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012855
    77 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  3. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010207
    61 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266012598
    21 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.