Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld27 February 20243321554

The Lord Clyde, 340-342 Essex Road, London, N1 3PB

Planning appeal 3321554 at The Lord Clyde, 340-342 Essex Road, London, N1 3PB (London Borough of Islington) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 27 February 2024 by Inspector Jones D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, having particular regard to whether or not it preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the East Canonbury Conservation Area, and the setting of nearby locally listed buildings.

the erection of a metal and glass screen to enclose the outside seating area to the front of the building

Authority
London Borough of Islington
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Householder developments
Inspector
Jones D
Postcode
N1 3PB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area, having particular regard to whether or not it preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the East Canonbury Conservation Area, and the setting of nearby locally listed buildings

What decided it

The development fails to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the East Canonbury Conservation Area and harms the setting of nearby locally listed buildings, and the public benefits do not outweigh this heritage harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
PLAN 1DH2D3D4HC1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 205Paragraph 208Paragraph 209

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

At least 816 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Islington

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Notice upheld23 September 20263364241
    First and Second Floors, 72 Prebend Street, Islington, London, N1 8PR
  2. Notice varied and upheld10 September 20263355155
    204 Blackstock Road , London, N5 1EN
  3. Dismissed12 February 20263333853
    76 Marlborough Road, London, N19 4NJ
  4. Notice varied and upheld22 January 20263351223
    234 Brecknock Road, London, N19 5BQ
  5. Split Decision12 August 20253325346
    11 Sekforde Street, Islington, London, EC1R 0HD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.