Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 April 20243321664

Oakhurst Stilebridge Lane, Marden, TONBRIDGE, TN12 9BA

Authority
Maidstone Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other minor developments
Inspector
Francis L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether condition 24 is necessary and reasonable in the interests of energy efficiency

What decided it

The clear policy support in the Framework and development plan for renewable and low carbon energy provision in new development, combined with the absence of substantive evidence that such provision is not feasible for the caravan scheme, makes condition 24 necessary and reasonable.

Framework references: 157

Plan policies cited: Policy DM1, Policy BE3, Policy LPRSP14(C), Policy LPRQD4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.