Planning appeal decision
Cable Hut, Western Esplanade, Broadstairs, Kent, CT10 1TD
Planning appeal 3321666 at Cable Hut, Western Esplanade, Broadstairs, Kent, CT10 1TD (Thanet District Council) was dismissed on 7 June 2024 by Inspector Sylvester G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would affect the integrity of the Thanet section of the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site, as a protected European site of nature conservation importance.
the conversion of disused cable hut into dwelling
- Authority
- Thanet District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Sylvester G
- Postcode
- CT10 1TD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposed development would affect the integrity of the Thanet section of the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay Special Protection Area (SPA) and Ramsar site, as a protected European site of nature conservation importance
- The effect on biodiversity and protected species, with particular regard to Bats
- The effect on the significance of the appeal building as a non-designated heritage asset (NDHA)
- The effect on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to its location within an area of high townscape value
- Whether adequate living conditions for future occupiers would be provided with particular regard to interior space
- The effect on land stability and coastal erosion
What decided it
The proposal would have a significant adverse effect on the integrity of the Thanet Coast and Sandwich Bay SPA with no legally binding mechanism to secure required mitigation, providing a clear refusal reason that outweighed all other considerations.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP29Policy SP36Policy QD02Policy QD03Policy QD04Policy SP35Policy CC03Policy HE03Policy BSP2Policy BSP7Policy BSP9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 130Paragraph 135Paragraph 176Paragraph 177Paragraph 178Paragraph 179Paragraph 180Paragraph 186Paragraph 209
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Thanet
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed28 October 2026600974375 Ramsgate Road, Margate, CT9 5SA
- Dismissed27 October 20266009253Land Adjacent Eastchurch Road And, Ashurst Gardens, Margate, CT9 3HY
- Allowed21 October 202660130894 Convent Road, Broadstairs, CT10 3BE
- Dismissed6 October 20266008000166 Percy Avenue, Kingsgate, Broadstairs, CT10 3LF
- Allowed3 September 202660089437 The Ridgeway, Broadstairs, CT10 2HB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®