Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 April 20243321753

25 Spencer Road, BOURNEMOUTH, BH1 3TE

alterations and further rear extension to an approved application 7-2010-4800-B for extension and conversion to 7 flats

Authority
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Castle S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to outlook and privacy
  • the effect of the development on the living conditions of the future occupiers of the development, with particular regard to indoor and outdoor space
  • the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the development on designated European habitats sites

What decided it

The substantial adverse impacts on the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of both existing and future occupiers significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited housing benefits when assessed against Framework policies as a whole.

The limited benefits of housing contribution and sustainable location were substantially outweighed by the significant harms to character and appearance and living conditions of existing and future occupiers, such that permission should be refused despite the Council's inability to demonstrate a five-year housing land supply.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy 6.10, Policy 6.13, Policy 6.8, Policy CS21, Policy CS41, Policy CS33

Judgments cited: Malvern Hills DC v SSE & Barnes and Co [1982] JPL 439

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.