Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 February 20243321863

Rear of 13-17 Bridge Road, Wembley, HA9 9AB

Planning appeal 3321863 at Rear of 13-17 Bridge Road, Wembley, HA9 9AB (London Borough of Brent) was dismissed on 6 February 2024 by Inspector Storey P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposed development is acceptable having regard to the protection of employment floorspace.

change of use from Use Class E to Use Class C3

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Storey P
Postcode
HA9 9AB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development is acceptable having regard to the protection of employment floorspace
  • whether the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for future occupiers in respect of outlook, light, floor to ceiling height and provision of external amenity space
  • whether the proposed development would provide adequate facilities for the storage of cycles and refuse
  • whether the proposed development would make adequate provision for urban greening

What decided it

The unjustified loss of employment floorspace combined with inadequate living conditions (particularly poor outlook, insufficient floor-to-ceiling heights, and inadequate external amenity space) meant the proposal conflicted with the development plan with no material considerations to override this.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy BE3Policy DMP1Policy BH13Policy D6Policy BH4Policy T5Policy BT2Policy G5

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

537 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Brent

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Planning permission granted25 September 20263377160
    26 Sidmouth Road, London, NW2 5HJ
  2. Notice varied and upheld21 August 20263346972
    The Lodge Restaurant, The Lodge, Kingsbury Road, London, NW9 9HA
  3. Notice varied and upheld14 August 20263364758
    Flats 1-3, 11 Blenheim Gardens, London, NW2 4NL
  4. Notice varied and upheld12 August 20263343790
    10 Stewart Close, London, NW9 8AJ
  5. Split Decision10 August 20263349809
    10 Birchen Grove, London, NW9 8SA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.