Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 September 20233321929

95 Vera Avenue, LONDON, N21 1RN

a part two storey, part first floor rear extension, two storey side extension together with extension to roof to allow conversion of loft into habitable space with front and side roof lights

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Callister V

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect on the character and appearance of the appeal dwelling and that of the local area
  • The living conditions of neighbouring residential occupiers

What decided it

The proximity of the two storey side extension to the boundary and its resulting overbearing effect on neighbouring living conditions, combined with its incongruous appearance within the local area character, constituted substantial harm that could not be justified.

Framework references: 130

Plan policies cited: CP30, DMD6, DMD8, DMD11, DMD13, DMD14, DMD37, D3, D6, D8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.