Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 January 20243321938

49 Lower Kings Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT2 5JA

Planning appeal 3321938 at 49 Lower Kings Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT2 5JA (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was dismissed on 8 January 2024 by Inspector Hickey A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area.

conversion of vacant nursery to provide 6no. high quality residential units

Authority
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Hickey A
Postcode
KT2 5JA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the suitability of the development in terms of flood risk
  • whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for the future occupiers with regard to outlook and private amenity space
  • whether the proposal would make adequate provision for cycle parking

What decided it

The proposal conflicts with flood risk policies in the Framework and development plan, and this conflict is not outweighed by the benefits of housing delivery given the shortfall in five-year supply.

the modest benefits of housing delivery and economic activity were insufficient to outweigh the significant detrimental harms to character and appearance, flood risk concerns, and living conditions

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM10Policy D3Policy DM4Policy D11Policy SI 12Policy D6Policy T5Policy DM8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

345 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Allowed23 October 20266014767
    13 Hawks Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 3DS
  2. Dismissed16 October 20266005462
    150 Ewell Road, Surbiton, KT6 6HE
  3. Dismissed8 October 20266014049
    69 Sheephouse Way, New Malden, KT3 5PF
  4. Dismissed7 October 20266011912
    11 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
  5. Dismissed6 October 20266009912
    Onslow House First Floor Flat, 1 Crummock Chase, Surbiton, KT6 4NP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.