Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Quashed On Legal Grounds12 April 20243322357

Haveringland Hall Caravan Park, Haveringland, Norwich, NR10 4PN

Planning appeal 3322357 at Haveringland Hall Caravan Park, Haveringland, Norwich, NR10 4PN (Broadland District Council) was decided (quashed on legal grounds) on 12 April 2024 by Inspector Moore D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the matters alleged in the notice have occurred as a matter of fact, namely whether the twin-unit structures occupied as sole or main residences meet the statutory definition of a 'caravan' for the purposes of condition 2 of planning permission Ref 2016/0531 (ground (b)).

Continued use of holiday caravan park including associated landscaping, internal roads, car parking, pathways, removal of disused show caravan base (enforcement notice alleges breach of condition 2 restricting caravan occupation to holiday purposes only)

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
caravan-gypsy · Major traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Moore D
Postcode
NR10 4PN

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the matters alleged in the notice have occurred as a matter of fact, namely whether the twin-unit structures occupied as sole or main residences meet the statutory definition of a 'caravan' for the purposes of condition 2 of planning permission Ref 2016/0531 (ground (b))

What decided it

Whether each twin-unit structure was, when assembled, physically capable of being moved by road without structural damage so as to meet the statutory definition of a 'caravan'.

What the Inspector cited

Judgments
Wyre Forest BC v Allen's Caravans [1990] 2 WLR 517; Barton Parks Ltd v SSHCLG [2022] EWCA Civ 883; FSS v Arun DC [2006] EWCA Civ 1172; Wyre Forest DC v SSE [1990] 1 All ER 780; Ynys Mon Isle of Anglesey BC v SSW [1984] JPL 646; Brightlingsea Haven Ltd v Morris [2008] EWHC 1928 (QB); Measor v SSETR [1998] 4 PLR 93; R (oao Save Woolley Valley Action Group) v Bath and North East Somerset Council [2012] EWHC 2161 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

14 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Broadland

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed21 July 20253347126
    The Great Oak Equestrian, Witton Lane, Witton, Norfolk , NR13 5DR
  2. Planning permission granted30 May 20253326244
    10 Penn Road, Taverham, Norwich, NR8 6NJ
  3. Notice upheld3 October 20243345653
    Weston Equestrian Centre, Morton Lane, Weston Longville, Norwich, Norfolk, NR9 5JL
  4. Notice upheld27 November 20233297989
    Holey Oak, Honingham Road, Weston Longville, NR9 5LA
  5. Notice varied and upheld18 January 20223277033
    Land at Rodgate, Norwich Road, Marsham, Norwich, NR10 5SR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.