Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed12 February 20243322538

Leverton Stores, 50 Leverton Street, London, NW5 2PG

Planning appeal 3322538 at Leverton Stores, 50 Leverton Street, London, NW5 2PG (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 12 February 2024 by Inspector Ellison H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Kentish Town Conservation Area.

a new replacement external storage unit for Leverton Stores located on retail forecourt

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
retail · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Ellison H
Postcode
NW5 2PG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development preserves or enhances the character or appearance of the Kentish Town Conservation Area

What decided it

The storage unit's obtrusive appearance, height, and positioning would cause less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Kentish Town Conservation Area, and the limited public benefits of the development do not outweigh this harm when great weight must be given to the asset's conservation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CC4 of the Kentish Town Neighbourhood Forum Neighbourhood PlanPolicy C1 of the Camden Local Plan 2017Policy TC5 of the Camden Local Plan 2017Policy D1 of the Camden Local Plan 2017Policy D2 of the Camden Local Plan 2017Policy D3 of the Camden Local Plan 2017Policy D3 of the Kentish Town Neighbourhood PlanPolicy T4 of the Camden Local Plan 2017Policy DM1 of the Camden Local Plan 2017
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 205Paragraph 208

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

724 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Camden

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed13 October 20266013300
    166 Grafton Road, London, NW5 4BA
  2. Allowed12 October 20266007435
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
  3. Allowed12 October 20266007433
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
  4. Allowed12 October 20266007308
    Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY
  5. Allowed12 October 20266007299
    Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.