Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed2 February 20243322802

12 Norland Place, LONDON, W11 4QG

a roof addition to front half of main roof and retention of the remaining rear section as a roof terrace

Authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Clowes M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with regard to the loss of privacy and noise and disturbance
  • If any harm and any conflict with the development plan would arise in respect of the first main issue, whether there are any material considerations to indicate that the appeal should be allowed, with particular reference to the CLEUD and the December 2023 permission

What decided it

The fallback position of an extant planning permission for a substantially identical extension and the existing lawful use of the roof as a terrace, confirmed by Certificate of Lawfulness, carried sufficient weight to outweigh the conflict with the development plan regarding loss of privacy.

Framework references: 135, 56

Plan policies cited: Policy CL5, Policy N3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.